Energy Reports
Search
•
RSS Feed
|
Predictably Unpredictable: Volatility In Future Energy Supply And Price From California’s Over-Dependence On Natural Gas
9/26/2001
Predictably_Unpredictable.pdf
|
Executive Summary
As the new home of CALPIRG's environmental work, Environment California
can be contacted with any questions regarding this report.
In response to the California energy crisis,
state policy makers have rushed to approve
and encourage the construction of as many
natural gas power plants as possible. This
could have dangerous effects on the state's
long-term energy stability.
Demand for natural gas across the country
is skyrocketing, and domestic supplies are
tight. Because California has become more
heavily dependent on natural gas for electricity
production than any other state, it is
particularly vulnerable to supply disruptions
and price volatility. By relying so heavily on
one fuel source, the state risks setting itself
up for another energy crisis in the near future.
California policy makers should therefore
pull back from their haste in building
natural gas power plants and tap the vast instate
potential for renewable energy instead.
Demand for natural gas is skyrocketing.
• Natural gas consumption is growing
rapidly in the U.S., with demand
expected to be 60% greater in 2020 than
it is today. Worldwide demand is
expected to double by 2020.
• In California, use of natural gas for
electricity generation has increased by
8% since 1999 and is expected to
increase by another 29% over the next
few years.
• Twenty-six new natural gas power
plants with a combined capacity of
11,303 megawatts (MW), enough power
for 7.7 million homes, have been
approved since 1999.
• 94.5% of new centralized energy
production currently under development
will come from natural gas. Only 5.1%
will come from clean renewable resources
- geothermal and wind. 45% of
California's electricity will be generated
from natural gas when all approved new
plants are built.
The U.S. has very limited supplies of natural
gas.
• The U.S. Geological Survey estimates
that the U.S. has 1,049 trillion cubic feet
(tcf) of gas. Only 2.6% of it is in
California. Only 16% of it is proved
reserves.
• If demand were to grow by 2.3% per
year through 2020 as predicted by the
Department of Energy and stay constant
thereafter, and imports from foreign
nations remain around 16% of demand,
this amount of gas only constitutes a 38-
year supply.
• The productivity of gas wells is steadily declining.
We are having to drill more wells
per year just to produce the same amount of
gas.
• There are 2½ times as many wells in the
U.S. today as there were in 1973, but
each well is only producing a third as
much gas.
If well productivity continues to decline
at the current rate, U.S. energy companies
will have to drill more than 700,000
wells over the next twenty years to meet
national production goals. This is 2.3
times as many wells as are currently in
operation.
• Since we've already tapped the more
accessible reserves, many of these wells
will be deeper in the ground, deeper
under water, and deeper into ecologically
sensitive areas.
California and U.S. energy officials are
knowingly instituting an energy policy that
will lead to increased dependence on foreign
fuel supplies.
• DOE predicts the U.S. will import 17%
of its gas by 2020.
• Because of limited domestic supplies
and limits to the growth rate of production, this is likely to be a vast underestimation.
• As domestic reserves become further
depleted, the shortfall will undoubtedly
worsen after 2020.
• California's over-dependence on natural gas
will lead to steadily rising prices mixed with
periodic price spikes. Although prices may
drop over the next few years from their currently
inflated levels, the long-term trend is
expected to be upward.
• As larger gas fields are depleted, smaller
ones will be more expensive to develop.
• Gas companies will increasingly have to
rely on unconventional reserves requiring
advanced equipment to excavate.
• Since shipping gas overseas requires
liquefying the gas at -256 degrees
Fahrenheit, it is very expensive.
• Gas price volatility has increased since
the early 1980s as the industry has
become more tied to short-term market
signals.
• Occasional price spikes have always
been a regular feature of the natural gas
market due to periodic supply disruptions.
As we narrow the margin between
growing demand and available supply,
these disruptions are sure to become
more frequent and severe.
The cost of renewable energy generation will
steadily decline and will not be subject to
price spikes. Proposals for new renewable
energy projects are ready to go.
• Because renewable energy has no fuel
costs, its costs are predictable and
stable. Once the plants are built, producers
only have to pay the regular operating
and management costs to keep the
power flowing.
• Both wind and solar energy costs have
plummeted over the last 20 years
and are predicted to continue declining.
Geothermal energy costs are already
very competitive and are predicted to
remain steady.
• Several new renewable energy projects
are currently under construction.
Renewable energy companies have
already presented many other proposals
to the new California Consumer Power
and Conservation Financing Authority.
|