|
Energy Reports
Search
•
RSS Feed
|
Cashing in on Clean Energy: A National Renewable Electricity Standard Will Benefit California's Economy and the Environment
2007-07-12
News Release
|
Executive Summary
America’s
current energy system is dominated by fossil fuels, which pose serious threats
to our health and environment and leave us vulnerable to price spikes and
supply shortages. With the threat of global warming becoming increasingly
urgent, we must make responsible energy choices today that ensure a safe,
reliable power supply and a healthy environment for future generations.
Fortunately, there are practical and affordable ways to
achieve this goal. Homegrown renewable
energy resources—such as wind, solar, bioenergy, and geothermal—can help reduce
our dependence on polluting fossil fuels. These clean energy sources can also
help stabilize energy prices, stimulate the development of innovative new
technology, and create high-quality jobs and other economic benefits for California and the
nation.
Strong national policies can ensure these benefits are fully
realized. The policy that has proven most effective A National Renewable
Electricity Standard Will Benefit California’s
Economy and the Environment and popular at the state level is a renewable
electricity standard (also known as a renewable portfolio standard or RPS),
which requires electricity providers to supply a minimum percentage of their
power from clean energy sources. As of June 2007, renewable electricity
standards have been adopted in California
and 22 other states. At the national level, the U.S. Senate has passed a 10
percent by 2020 national renewable electricity standard three times since 2002—most
recently in June 2005.
Momentum continues to grow for a strong national standard. A
20 percent by 2020 standard was introduced in the House of Representatives in February
2007, and a 15 percent by
2020 standard is under consideration in the Senate.1 Using a
model from the Energy Information Administration (EIA), the Union of Concerned
Scientists (UCS) examined the long-term effects that a national 20 percent by
2020 standard would have on the economy and the environment, under two
different scenarios: an “EIA case,” which assumes no changes to the model, and
a “UCS case,” which makes several modifications (described in the “Modeling
Methods” on the back page). Our analysis found that, under both cases, a
national standard would provide significant benefits for California. The findings from the UCS case
20 percent national standard are presented below, followed by findings for the
EIA case 20 percent standard.
|