logo

Global Warming News

SearchRSS Feed

For Immediate Release:
11/29/2006
For More Information:
Contact Bernadette Del Chiaro
(916) 446-8062 x 103

Supreme Court Hears Landmark Global Warming Case

The U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments today in a landmark global warming case.  The case will decide whether the Clean Air Act authorizes the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate the pollution that causes global warming.

“For six years, the Bush administration has towed the oil, coal, and auto industry line on global warming, but today is their day of reckoning,” said Environment California Global Warming Advocate Jason Barbose.

In direct conflict with previous EPA legal opinions, EPA now claims that the Clean Air Act does not give it the authority to regulate global warming pollution.  Yet, the Clean Air Act explicitly authorizes EPA to regulate emissions of any air pollutant that “may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare,” and it defines “welfare” to include adverse effects on “weather” and “climate.”

“We’re optimistic that today marks a turning point in our nation’s fight to protect future generations from global warming.  Finally, we’ll be able to start to put to work the many solutions that are available to reduce global warming pollution,” said Barbose.

While the case likely will have broad implications for regulating global warming from cars, power plants, and other sources, the Supreme Court will consider whether current law compels EPA to regulate global warming emissions from cars and light-trucks.  California’s global warming tailpipe emissions standards for cars and light-trucks could be affected by the ruling in the case.  Under the Clean Air Act, California may adopt tailpipe emissions standards above and beyond minimum federal standards, and other states are then allowed opt-in to California’s rules.  So far, ten states also have adopted California’s clean cars program.

“California and other states have been at the forefront of action on global warming,” said Barbose.

California and the national advocacy office for Environment California (U.S. PIRG) are petitioners in the case, along with a coalition of states, cities, and environmental organizations.  For a complete list of the petitioners and other documents related to the case, go to www.cleancarscampaign.org and click on “Court Action.”