By Janet Wilson and Richard Simon, Times Staff
Writers
January 18, 2007
California's two senators this week
offered markedly different approaches to slowing global warming, with Dianne
Feinstein saying she may move to exempt power companies from her home state's
landmark global warming laws and bring them under federal regulation
instead.
Coal-fired and other fossil-burning power plants are the largest
source of greenhouse gases in the United States, producing a third of all
emissions.
A draft of Feinstein's bill included an exemption clause, but
it was omitted before she introduced it Wednesday after protests from
representatives of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, legislative leaders and some
environmental groups.
In an interview Wednesday, however, Feinstein did
not rule out adding it back at some point.
"I want to take another look,"
she said.
Under the clause, power plants would be exempt from any state
laws regulating greenhouse gases, including several in New England as well as
California. Feinstein said she had removed it for now because "I know the
environmentalists have concern."
The bill she introduced, which deals
just with the electricity sector, calls for a market-based cap and trade system.
The bill would ratchet down electricity sector emissions 25% below projected
levels by 2020.
Sen. Barbara Boxer, in contrast, has signed onto a bill
introduced Tuesday that covers a wider spectrum of greenhouse gas sources,
including motor vehicles, and would reduce U.S. emissions to 1990 levels by 2020
and to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050. The 2050 goal goes beyond what Feinstein's
legislation calls for. The Boxer bill has no mandatory cap and trade program.
Many environmentalists favor the approach Boxer is sponsoring because it
is broader.
"Boxer's bill is the gold standard," Jason Barbose of
Environment California said.
Feinstein intends to introduce several other
bills in coming months that would also address global warming, her spokesman
said.
Both senators are part of the Democratic majority, but Boxer
chairs the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee and could play a key
role in moving global warming legislation. Boxer called Feinstein's bill — one
of many that have been introduced — a "positive addition" to the debate and said
Feinstein would be invited to discuss her bill with the committee.
While
not commenting on the specifics of Feinstein's original exemption provision,
Boxer said, "I always fear preemption. I just don't like preemption. I think
it's wrong. I have always felt if the state has a higher level of protection for
the environment, let it go….I don't like to see a state told you can't have a
stronger bill."
California officials expressed more concern, saying
preempting the state's laws could add millions of tons more greenhouse gases
back into the atmosphere. Schwarzenegger's staff, Assembly Speaker Fabian Nuñez
(D-Los Angeles) and other officials made calls to Feinstein in the last week
asking her not to include the clause.
"Let me just be real, real clear,"
said Nuñez, author of Assembly Bill 32, the framework for the state's global
warming policies. "Getting AB 32 negotiated and approved by the Legislature and
signed by the governor was no easy task…. It's attracted worldwide attention,
and it's landmark legislation…. We will do everything we can to ensure that AB
32 is not watered down in any form by federal legislation. If we cannot do that,
then obviously we're going to have a serious problem."
He said that a
long conversation last week with Feinstein had left him optimistic, but that
talks would continue.
Schwarzenegger said in an interview Tuesday, "It's
much better if the two work together, the federal government and the state,
because we want to keep our very good law, AB 32, alive." He added, "We want to
shoot for … 2020 and rolling it back to the 1990 levels."
A senior
Schwarzenegger administration official said that "we've had extensive
discussions" with Feinstein, and that "she's trying to be very careful to avoid
preempting our efforts."
But Feinstein said she wanted the opportunity to
sit down with California officials and an electricity industry group that had
endorsed her legislation to "really understand how a preemption would work …
whether it would impede California's program or not. I don't believe it would …
because the cuts [in emissions] are about the same…. I intend to personally sit
in on this part of the negotiation and take another look at it."
Asked
whether that means she would consider preempting state laws as her bill and
several others introduced in Congress move forward, Feinstein said, "I might
consider anything, yeah, anything."
A coalition of six electric
companies endorsed the bill Feinstein introduced on Wednesday. The group
includes PG&E Corp., which has strongly backed California policies as well;
Calpine Corp.; Entergy Corp.; Exelon Corp.; Florida Power & Light Co.; and
Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. Together the companies provide power to 26
million customers in several states.
PG&E President Peter A. Darbee,
who joined Feinstein at her Capitol Hill news conference, called the bill a
"pragmatic, aggressive" response to a serious problem. "We're proud to support
it — just as we supported California's landmark climate law.
"Adopting
legislation to cap greenhouse gas emissions at the federal level is the greatest
way of efficiently addressing climate change, and a necessary step in
positioning the U.S. as a global leader on environmental issues," Darbee said.
Feinstein said the companies pushed for a preemption
clause.
"Their thinking is to have a level playing field throughout the
United States so that this thing can work easily across boundaries," Feinstein
said. "We had language, and I just decided, 'Let's hold up on it because I don't
know enough about it' … and they have agreed to that."
Nuñez said his
staff had done an analysis of the proposed preemption and found that "it is
hurtful. It would increase our carbon output in California by millions of metric
tons."
Feinstein's office provided an analysis that it said showed that
her bill would result in an 11% to 12% cut in national electric sector emissions
from 2005 levels by 2020, while AB 32, sponsored by Nuñez and signed by
Schwarzenegger, would result in a 15% reduction in California emissions over the
same period.
Some environmentalists were sharply critical of Feinstein
for even considering preemption.
"I think it's incredibly troubling"
that Feinstein would consider limiting her state's laws, said Emily Figdor, a
clean air and energy advocate with Environment California's Washington office.
"California for the last four decades has been at the forefront of
reducing air pollution in this country, and has shown the critical importance of
being able to try things out at the state level … with policies that eventually
are adopted nationwide," she said.
janet.wilson@latimes.com
richard.simon@ltimes.com
Times
staff writer Jordan Rau contributed to this report.