|
Safe Climate Act Fact Sheet
Global
warming is the greatest environmental challenge of our time. Sea levels are on the rise, ice and snow
cover are decreasing, and storms are becoming more powerful. Leading
scientists, such as James Hansen of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies,
caution that we are nearing a climate “tipping point,” beyond which
large-scale, dangerous
impacts would become unavoidable.[i] The Safe Climate Act aims to keep emissions
of the pollutants that cause global warming below this threshold and protect
future generations from dangerous global warming. In 1992, the U.S. and most other nations agreed
to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which has the
objective of stabilizing concentrations of global warming pollutants in the
atmosphere at a level that would prevent “dangerous anthropogenic interference”
with the climate system.[ii] The Safe Climate Act aims to achieve this
objective. Emission Reduction Targets Specifically, the Safe Climate Act freezes U.S. emissions at 2009 levels in 2010. Starting in 2011, the bill reduces emissions by roughly 2 percent per year, reaching 1990 levels in 2020, which is equivalent to a 15 percent reduction from current (2005) levels. These reductions can be achieved using clean energy technologies that we already have but are not using much, such as hybrid vehicles and wind power. Starting in 2021, the bill reduces emissions by roughly 5 percent per year, reaching 80 percent below 1990 levels in 2050. These reductions can be achieved as more advanced technologies, such as zero-energy buildings and biofuels from waste materials, become widely available. The 2020 and 2050 goals are similar to those adopted by California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Prime Minister Tony Blair. Achieving the Emission Reductions To help achieve
the emission reductions, the bill calls for a greater reliance on clean,
renewable energy sources, improved energy efficiency, and clean cars. It also provides companies flexibility in
meeting the pollution-reduction goals by establishing a cap-and-trade
program. Specifically:
Periodic Scientific Review The bill directs the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) to review, every five years, our progress in avoiding dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. If the NAS finds that dangerous global warming is likely, it must identify the reductions needed and recommend additional national and international actions to achieve the reductions.
[i] James E. Hansen, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies and Columbia University Earth Institute, Is There Still Time to Avoid “Dangerous Anthropogenic Interference” with Global Climate, presentation to the American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2005, opening remarks. [ii] United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, available at http://www.globelaw.com/Climate/fcc.htm. For U.S. ratification date, see http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/tables/treaties.htm. [iii] Malte Meinshausen, “What Does a 2ËšC Target Mean for Greenhouse Gas Concentrations? A Brief Analysis Based on Multi-Gas Emission Pathways and Several Climate Sensitivity Uncertainty Estimates,” in Hans Joachim Schnellnhuber, ed., Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 2006. [iv] Rachel Warren, “Impacts of Global Climate Change at Different Annual Mean Global Temperature Increases,” in Hans Joachim Schnellnhuber, ed., Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 2006. [v] Jason A. Lowe et al, “The Role of Sea-Level Rise and the Greenland Ice Sheet in Dangerous Climate Change: Implications for the Stabilisation of the Climate,” in Hans Joachim Schellnhuber et al. (eds.), Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 29-36; James Hansen, “A Slippery Slope: How Much Global Warming Constitutes ‘Dangerous Anthropogenic Interference?’” Climatic Change, 68:269-279, 2005. |