logo

Detecting Toxic Chemicals

What's New

Victory! On September 29, 2006, Governor Schwarzenegger signed into law our Chemical Detection bill, AB 289 (Chan).  Effective January 1, 2007, this law gives the state the tools it needs to detect potentially-harmful chemicals that currently go undetected in our bodies and the environment.  California is the first state in the country to enact such a law.  Please read our press release for more information.

Brief Summary

Our inability to track toxic chemicals
According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, there are more than 85,000 chemicals in commercial use. After initial use, chemicals often find their way into our bodies and the environment. Of the 58 million pounds of chemicals reportedly released annually in California, scientists are able to track less than 10% of these chemicals because they do not have the methods necessary to detect them.

Autism, birth defects, learning disabilities, and many forms of cancer are on the rise in California. Research shows that environmental contaminants, including toxic chemicals, may be having a significant impact. To reduce our exposure and accurately assess the need for action against such contaminants, it is essential that our state scientists have the necessary methods to detect, track, and evaluate the chemicals widely present in our environment and in our bodies. Unfortunately, without costing the state millions of dollars, there is no way for us to know how toxic chemicals are accumulating in our bodies and in the environment.

Shifting the burden to the chemical manufacturers
The Chemical Detection bill, AB 289, authorizes state agencies to request from chemical manufacturers the analytical test methods for detecting their chemicals in air, water, soil, and the human body. AB 289 shifts the cost of developing these methods from taxpayers to the manufacturers profiting from the chemicals. In many cases, chemical manufacturers already possess these methods. In cases in which they do not possess the methods, it will be far easier for manufacturers to develop them, as they are the most familiar with the chemical’s properties. Although state agencies would still need to verify the accuracy of the methods provided by the chemical manufacturers, the costs to validate the methods are substantially lower than starting from scratch.

California is the first state in the country with such a law.

Protecting public health
Under the current system, critical time is lost when government agencies have to spend months and even years developing an analytical test method. California scientists estimate that they have the ability to track fewer than 10% of the high production volume chemicals in use in California (i.e., chemicals with an annual production and/or importation volume above 1 million pounds). This can mean that our public health agencies must race to catch up with emerging toxic problems, which this was the case with the discovery of PBDEs (toxic flame retardants) in breast milk and rocket fuel in drinking water.

Saving the state money
Currently, state agencies investigating the potential hazard of a chemical must develop the analytical test methods for finding the chemical in air, water, soil, and the human body, which is an expensive and time-consuming process. The cost of developing analytical test methods can run up to one million dollars for a single chemical, placing a significant financial burden on state agencies and California taxpayers. The Chemical Detection bill will save the state millions of dollars by shifting the financial costs from state agencies to the industries producing the chemicals.